chore: version packages - #358
Merged
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
changeset-release/main
branch
26 times, most recently
from
September 23, 2026 21:10
9779b2a to
6701bce
Compare
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
changeset-release/main
branch
from
September 23, 2026 22:45
6701bce to
7169600
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and publish to npm yourself or setup this action to publish automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@taskless/cli@0.11.3
Compare with v0.11.2
Patch Changes
aa49d45:
taskless check --rule <id>(repeatable) restricts a run to the named rules, so a rule can be measured over the whole project without running every other rule and filtering the JSON afterwards. The filter applies to both static engines and to runtime rules, keeps every exclusion a whole-project run applies, and refuses an id no rule directory has.d7b33ab:
taskless detectrecognizes oxlint alongside eslint, biome and stylelint, from.oxlintrc.json,.oxlintrc.jsonc,oxlint.config.ts,oxlint.config.mts, or anoxlintentry inpackage.json.5047148: The feedback survey is replaced for 0.11.3. Only the kind of rule the user was trying to create is required now; the user's own words, the completion verdict, what worked, what did not, the agent in use, and the most valuable rule so far are all optional. A
skipat the invite no longer dismisses the survey: the agent sends its own account of the session and leaves the user's words out.feedback dismissis reserved for a user who asks that nothing be sent. Every install is invited once more, since the new survey keeps its own cadence.dcfb546: Scaffold migration
9— the one that renames a rule id held by more than one engine — now survives being interrupted, and no longer double-suffixes a fixture you had already named<id>-sg-….Migration 9 has not been in a released version, so nothing on disk anywhere was produced by the old behaviour and there is no repair step to run.
latestis0.11.2, tagged 2026-09-19; the migration landed 2026-09-22.It could not resume. It renamed the rule directory first and then chased the files inside it, but renaming the directory is what resolves the collision, and the migration returns early when no collision is left. So a run that died in between — a
Ctrl-C, a full disk, an editor holding a file open — leftsg/no-eval-sg/containingno-eval.ymlwithid: no-evaland fixtures still under theno-eval-prefix.verifyreported that as broken, and runningtaskless initagain fixed nothing, because every later run found no collision and returned.The order is reversed: the rule file, its
id:field, the.tests/fixtures and a Vale rule's.vale.iniare all rewritten under the old directory name, and the directory rename is the last thing to happen. A directory rename is a single atomic operation, so it is the moment a rule is done. A rule interrupted before it still collides and is picked up by the next run; a rule interrupted after it is already whole. Each inner step also tolerates having already run, and every file rewrite is committed by renaming a temporary sibling, so an interrupted write cannot truncate a rule file.One asymmetry can survive an interruption. Where
sgandvaleboth hold an id, a complete run moves both and neither keeps the bare id. If a run is interrupted between the two halves, the half that finished keeps its suffix and the other keeps the bare id, because the collision it would have been renamed for is gone. The tree is collision-free and every rule is internally consistent; only the symmetry is lost. Rename it yourself if you want the pair to match.A fixture already named
<id>-sg-…is no longer renamed again. The predicate picking fixtures to rename matched every name it produced, sono-eval-sg-basic-test.ymlinsg/no-eval/.tests/came out asno-eval-sg-sg-basic-test.ymlon the first run. Such a fixture is already at the right prefix, so it now keeps its name and only itsid:field follows — which still matters, since ast-grep attributes cases by theid:inside the file and a stale one reads as a rule that shipped no cases.5ac99d2: A failing schema migration is now reported once instead of twice, and the message names the migration that refused.
runMigrationsused to printMigration N failed: <message>itself and then rethrow the original, so the caller printed the same text again without the migration number — the longer and more useful the refusal, the worse it read. The prefix now rides on the rethrown error, so there is one string and one printer, and the originalCLIErrorcode (for exampleSCAFFOLD_CONFLICT) is preserved.taskless init --jsonalso emits an error envelope when a migration fails. It previously wrote nothing at all to stdout and put prose on stderr, leaving a machine consumer with only the exit code; it now writes the standard{ ok: false, code, message }envelope, with the migration number inmessage.1800521:
taskless checknow marks every notice it prints. A run with more than one advisory used to print the first behind aNotice:marker and the rest as bare, unindented lines with nothing identifying them as notices — so a Vale config advisory sitting beside Vale's own diagnostic read as stray output.verifyhad the same defect and it was fixed earlier;checkdid not get the fix until now.A second, related gap in the same output: the notices from runtime rule planning — what was repaired, what could not be, and why — were printed by their own loop with no
Notice:marker at all, while engine notices were marked.check --jsonmerges both into onenoticesarray, so the same message looked like two different kinds of thing depending on which list it arrived on. Every noticecheckprints is now marked, and every line of one is.The cause was that notices were joined into one string before they reached the renderer, so
check --jsonalso published array elements that were several notices glued together, with no separator a consumer could rely on to split them back apart. Notices are now carried as a list from producer to output: incheck --jsonthenoticesarray keeps its name and type, and only its element boundaries change — one element is now exactly one notice.What a consumer crosses: the optional
noticestring onverify --jsonandtest --jsonper-rule results is now anoticesarray of strings, present and empty rather than absent when there is nothing to say. The same replacement applies to the exportedverifyOutputSchema(itsschemalayer) andvaleVerifyOutputSchema. Readnoticeswhere you readnotice, and render one marker per element instead of splitting on a separator. It was replaced rather than mirrored because a joinednoticekept alongside would preserve the convention this change removes, and nothing ever published the separator that would have made splitting it safe.check --jsonconsumers need change nothing.6c3eff7:
taskless info --jsonrenames itstoolskey toharnesses, and givestoolsto the command-line binaries found onPATH.This is the consumer-visible part. The array that lists Claude Code,
Codex, Cursor and OpenCode, with each one's installed skills and their
staleness, is unchanged in shape — it now lives under
harnesses. Anythingreading
.tools[].skillsfrominfo --jsonreads.harnesses[].skillsinstead. The new
toolsarray carries{ name, present, applicable, path? }for
gh,gitandjq.presentis established by looking for a file of that name onPATH.Taskless does not spawn a detected binary, does not read its version, and does
not hash it, so
present: trueis presence and not a working install. Asha256-against-published-releases tier was considered and dropped on
measurement: GitHub publishes digests for
gh's release archives andinstallers rather than for the extracted binary, and a Homebrew-installed
gh2.97.0 matched 0 of the 21 official digests — a tier that reports "unverified"
for the ordinary macOS install path is worse than no tier at all.
applicableis the separate question of whether a tool could accomplishanything where it is being asked to.
ghin a repository with no GitHuboriginis present and inapplicable, and reporting that as "missing" wouldproduce the one instruction that cannot help — "install
gh".The
onboardrecipe (topic v4) uses both. Its source menu now states what wasfound rather than telling the agent to run
command -v gh, says in one linewhy a source is not offered instead of dropping it silently, and no longer
names Linear as the expected issue tracker: a bug-tracker scan is offered when
the agent has an MCP that reaches one, with Jira and Linear as examples of the
class.
@taskless/cli/promptsis unaffected — with no host state supplied therecipe renders its full menu, unchanged.
patchrather thanminor: the package is0.y.z, where semver puts addedsurface outside the stability guarantee.
d41576f: Two rules can no longer share an id across engines.
verifyfails a rule whose id is also a directory name under another engine, and a new scaffold migration (9) renames the ones that already exist..taskless/rules/sg/no-eval/beside.taskless/rules/vale/no-eval/was silent:check's human output printserror[no-eval]with no engine, so a collision shows two identical lines, and every id-addressed command had two answers to choose between.Your rule ids may change on upgrade, and
checkoutput changes with them. The firsttaskless initafter upgrading renames the collidingsgandvalecopies to<id>-<engine>—sg/no-evalbecomessg/no-eval-sg,vale/no-evalbecomesvale/no-eval-vale. Where both move, neither keeps the bare id, so nobody has to work out which of their two rules kept the name. If<id>-<engine>is already taken it uses the next free<id>-<engine>-2,-3, … and never overwrites an existing rule.A
runtimerule is never renamed and keeps the bare id, so a collision betweenruntimeand another engine moves only the other one. Runtime rules are the signed and blessed tier, and this keeps the upgrade clear of that machinery. Nothing is left colliding either way, because one engine can only hold one directory per id.Everything the rename touches is inside the rule's own directory: the directory name, the rule file, its
id:field, an sg rule's.tests/fixtures and theirid:fields, and a Vale rule's.vale.inibreadcrumb and both segments of its<id>.<id>assignment. Every rename is printed — old path, new path, and each file rewritten — as is any runtime rule that kept its id, so you can see exactly what moved before committing it. Update any CI config, baseline file or suppression comment that names an old id — includingcheck --rule <id>, which errors withRULE_NOT_FOUNDrather than reporting zero findings when the id it names has been renamed out from under it..taskless/rule-metadata/<id>.ymlis left where it is rather than following either rule, since a symmetric rename gives it no owner. In practice there is nothing there: this CLI has never written a sidecar, because the service does not return the metadata block they are written from.8178d47:
testnow reports the findings an ast-grep rule's fixtures produced, with themessage as ast-grep rendered it. Previously only Vale and runtime rules carried
findings; an ast-grep rule reported an empty array, so a rule whose messageinterpolated its metavariables in the wrong order fired in exactly the right
places and was reported green.
Each snippet is replayed through
ast-grep scan --stdin, so the language comesfrom the rule's own
language:key and no temporary file is written. A findingnames the test YAML that declares the snippet, at the snippet's real line and
column in that file.
Additive, and
patchunder the pre-1.0 rule: thefindingsarray was alreadypresent on every rule result and documented as possibly empty, so nothing a
consumer reads changes shape. Vale and runtime behaviour is untouched, and the
verdict
ast-grep testdecides is unchanged — findings are gathered after itand cannot alter it.
c000762:
test --jsonnow reports the findings a rule's fixtures produced.Each rule result carries a
findingsarray: the same finding shapecheck --jsonprints —source,ruleId,severity,message,file,range,matchedText, and the optionalnoteandfix— plus abucketof"pass"or"fail"naming the fixture that produced it. The renderedmessageis the point. A rule whose message interpolates its captures can have the slots in the wrong order, fire on everyfail/fixture, stay quiet on everypass/one, and be reported as a rule that passed; the rendered message is the only evidence otherwise, and until now the only way to see it was a secondcheckrun against a fixture path you had to construct yourself.The array is always present and empty rather than absent — for a rule that produced nothing, one whose verification failed before its fixtures ran, a refused runtime rule,
verify(which runs no fixtures at all), and ast-grep rules, whose findings are not surfaced yet. Fail-bucket findings are reported on a passing run too, since that is the only run that produces them.On the human path a passing rule still prints one line. A failing rule now prints the findings that bear on the failure beneath it, labelled by bucket and rendered the way
checkrenders a finding. That includes pass-bucket findings:pass fixture wrongly fired: <file>said that it happened and never what matched.Vale and runtime rules only. ast-grep follows separately: the vendored binary's
sg testhas no--jsonand no output-format flag, and its fixtures are inline YAML scalars rather than files.No flag was added, and nothing new is executed: the findings were already in hand and were being discarded.
If you consume
@taskless/cli/schemas:zod's.parse()strips keys the schema does not declare, so a consumer still on the previously publishedverifyTestOutputSchemawill silently dropfindingsfrom the payload it returns until the dependency is upgraded. Nothing breaks — but the field simply not being there, on a CLI that is emitting it, is the kind of thing that generates a bug report.d3befa0: Update the bundled Vale to 3.22.0.
For a rule under
.taskless/rules/vale/, what you can now write:scope: text & ~link(and~strong,~emphasis,~code) runs on the paragraph and blanks the element's text out of it before the rule sees it, so a wording or casing rule can leave link text and bold terms alone without giving up the sentence around them. Positions after the blanked element do not move. The release note'stext.rawandparagraph.linkspellings are not scopes;verifyrejects them, so write the bare inline name.split: trueon aspellingrule checks the parts of an identifier (getHTTPResponsze_v2reportsResponsze) and places each at its own position. 3.21.0 accepted the key and did neither.frontmatterorfrontmatter.<key>rule reports every occurrence in a field at the field's own position; a token appearing twice in one field was reported once.<Note>...</Note>) is linted.What changes for a rule you already have:
BasedOnStyles =is removed from every rule's.vale.ini, by migration 0008 on the nextinit, andverifynow rejects the key with any value (vale-config-no-based-on-styles). Every earlier version of thecreate-vale-rulerecipe wrote the line into every matcher, where it was inert: no bundled style loads unless a run-levelBasedOnStylesnames one, and the assembled header names none. On 3.22.0 an empty value clears every setting a file inherited from an earlier matcher, and the assembled run config is every rule's matchers in id order, so a rule writing the line under[docs/**]silenced every alphabetically earlier rule underdocs/, and[*.md]beside another rule's[*.{md,markdown}]silenced the first on every.mdfile, with nothing reported.checkandverifyrefuse to run untilinithas migrated the configs, and name it; commit the rewritten files. A migrated config enables exactly what the old one did on 3.21.0.scopenegateslink,strong,emphasisorcodeno longer sees that element's text inside a paragraph. Through 3.21.0 the paragraph still carried it, so findings inside those elements disappear. Drop the negation if the rule was meant to reach them.testandverifybuild no longer writesBasedOnStyles =. Measured on both binaries, nothing fires without it andVale.Spellingnever could, so fixtures behave as before.Not changed for a rule this CLI assembles: a
[formats]key may now be a file name or a glob, but no rule config can carry one and the assembled header writes none, so the extension still decides the parser.UNSETas a rule's value behaves asNOand is not accepted;YESandNOremain the two values.taskless agent updatecarries the same list, with what to do about each.620865e:
verifyvalidates a Vale rule's.vale.iniagainst a schema and names the constraint each rejection violates. The config is parsed into an ordered structure and checked there: an assignment above the first matcher, a matcher without itstskl) rulebreadcrumb, a key naming another rule, a value other thanYES/NO, aBasedOnStylesassignment with any value, a config with no matcher or noYES, and aNOmatcher that precedes everyYES(both judged by each matcher's final verdict, so aYESa laterNOin the same matcher overrides does not count) are each rejected under avale-config-*constraint thatverify --jsonreports inviolations[]andreference.jsonpublishes. A repeated key, a[*]matcher, and a.taskless/**matcher are reported as a notice without failing the rule.checkruns the same schema before assembling the Vale run config, and a rejected config refuses the Vale engine for that run: the failure names the rule and the line, reaches the exit code, and ast-grep still runs. A rule is never silently left out of the assembled config. Accepted configs are written verbatim under their breadcrumb, so the one string edit assembly used to make (dropping a copied-inStylesPath) is gone; that line is now a rejection. Advisories reachcheck's notices. To find every rejected line at once, runtaskless verify.This is still
patch. The package is0.y.z, and every config the schema refuses was already being misread by Vale: a rule enabled nowhere with aW101on stderr, a rule silently overriding a neighbour, a disable the following enable cancelled. The release surfaces a defect the consumer already had rather than introducing one, the same call as linting files over 128 KB again in 0.11.3.78dc643:
verifywarns when a Vale rule'srawlist has more than one entry, since Vale concatenates them into one pattern rather than alternating them; thecreate-vale-rulerecipe explains the(a|b)form. The warning rides onnoticeand does not fail the rule.3acb5a1:
agent create-vale-rule(topic v13) corrects two claims that cost rule authors work. Vale patterns are not RE2-only: Vale compiles with Go'sregexpand falls back toregexp2, so lookahead, lookbehind and backreferences work, and the recipe no longer tells you to split a rule that one pattern expresses. Two silent limits are measured and documented alongside it: a backreference does nothing as aswapkey, and the implicit word boundary ontokens/swaplands after a trailing lookahead, so that lookahead has to peek at a non-word character.checkon a rule's.tests/failbucket is a supported way to read a rendered message, because.taskless/is excluded from the whole-project walk only; when that bucket comes back empty, the recipe now sends you to the rule's own config, specifically a[.taskless/**]matcher, before the pattern.verifycarried the same imprecision and now states both halves: a[.taskless/**]matcher is unnecessary on a whole-project check, AND it silences the rule on a path you name, such as the rule's own fixture bucket. It was previously described as acting only under a barevaleinvocation, which read as harmless.agent update(topic v10) is corrected to match.b2e2662:
checkno longer skips Vale target files over 128 KB. The guard(
VALE_MAX_FILE_BYTES, added in 0.11.2) was written against Vale 3.20.0,whose lint time grew superlinearly with the size of a single Markdown block,
so one large file could consume the run's whole timeout and, because Vale
writes nothing until the run finishes, cost every other file its findings.
The same release moved the vendored Vale to 3.21.0, whose perf work makes that
cost linear regardless of block structure, so the cap no longer separates a
cheap file from an expensive one. Re-measured on the reproduction from
Track upstream: Vale lint time is superlinear in single-block size, and no output is emitted until the run finishes #325 against the vendored 3.21.0 binary (darwin/arm64, warm, median
of three):
huge.md)What a user sees: a file that 0.11.2 named in a
Vale did not check N file(s) over 131072 bytesnotice is linted again and produces findings; the notice isgone. The per-file retry for a target whose front matter Vale cannot parse
(One unparseable file zeroes findings for the whole check run #300) is unchanged, as is the 60 s run timeout. Vale still emits
nothing until the run completes, so a run killed by an external time limit
still loses every finding; with linear cost that takes a file in the hundreds
of megabytes rather than the hundreds of kilobytes.
59e1163:
verifynow rejects a Valesubstitutionrule whoseswapkey carries a backreference. No capture group survives a swap key: Vale compiles a rule's keys into one alternation, wrapping each in a capture group of its own and rewriting the author's groups to non-capturing, so\1refers to Vale's wrapper and matches nothing. Vale reports none of this, so the rule loads, runs and silently never fires. The detector is character-class aware, since\1inside[…]is an octal escape and works.$1in the swap value is unaffected and still works. Thecreate-vale-ruletopic goes to v14: the claim that Vale tries Go'sregexpbefore falling back toregexp2is removed (there is no fallback; it compiles withregexp2unconditionally), theswapconstraint is generalised, and the leading-lookbehind mirror of the trailing-lookahead limit is documented.f97365d:
taskless --versionand-vprint the version. Before, both fell through to the full usage banner, and-vwas not recognised at all.Build Info
npx @taskless/cli-nightly@0.11.3-20260923224725x143ff37Built from: 143ff37
Built at: 2026-09-23 22:47:25