Repository navigation
Checkpoint request usage example - #727
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you. |
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds Sync Catch-Up (checkpoint request) examples across SDKs in a new “Wait for Local Data to Catch Up” section, following refresh actions in our demo apps.
Took this opportunity to further improve the Usage Examples page and fix some issues.
General improvements:
Fixes to existing examples:
Conventions:
SDKs now appear in the same order across the updated pages. Examples can leave out setup code, but the code shown must be correct and checked against the SDK source.
Verification: SDK source and demos reviewed; Vale, link checks, and JavaScript/TypeScript syntax checks pass. Native examples were not executed.
🤖 Updates were made by both Claude Code and Codex (one wrote, one reviewed). I scanned the code changes (the agents reviewed these against the source code) but reviewed all wording/explanations manually.