Document notes, reviewer and review_status on Preview scorecard entries - #673
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
s-harding
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why?
The Preview Conversation API now returns QA review notes on each
scorecardsentry wheninclude_scorecards=true, and the spec did not describe them. Thereviewerandreview_statusfields that shipped earlier were also missing from this spec, although the developer docs already list them.How?
Adds the
noteslist with its note and author schemas to the Previewconversation_scorecard, backfillsreviewerandreview_statusto match the developer docs, and extends the threeinclude_scorecards=trueexamples. Affects the Preview version only.Generated with Claude Code