(docs: changelog )master -> main

[grantmcdermott]

Missing bullet from the changelog merge

[eitsupi]

In my opinion, this is unrelated to the 3.0.0 release and therefore should not be included in the changelog.

Perhaps @randy3k didn't use GitHub's feature to change the branch name, but instead pushed a different main branch?
If we had used GitHub's feature to switch branch name, it should have been automatically routed, so there shouldn't have been a problem.

[grantmcdermott]

Agree to disagree, but imo it's part of the same organizational changes that have been implemented as part of this release cycle. It feel it's a change that should be documented somewhere too.

[eitsupi]

In my opinion, CHANGELOG is for users, not developers.
That said, if the default branch name of git is important somewhere I'm unaware of (a large company?), I wouldn't actively oppose adding it.

[randy3k]

IMO, I think it is valid change that could be documented. Though it is also okay to skip it entirely.

Ya, reflecting back, i should have renamed the branch instead of pushing a new one.

[renkun-ken]

LGTM