Skip to content

Remove retired client UI and split acquisition and filter components - #30

Merged
Eoic merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/repository-cleanup
Oct 3, 2026
Merged

Eoic merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/repository-cleanup

Conversation

@Eoic

@Eoic Eoic commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ticket

Repository housekeeping.

Summary

Remove 21 unreachable Dart implementations, five tests for retired implementations, four unused image assets, two unused direct dependencies, and two server workflows incorrectly copied into the client repository. Preserve useful retry, cleanup and account-scope coverage against the active BookImportController/BookImportSheet flow.

Extract the acquisition gateway and shared library filter fields into focused modules, retaining existing gateway imports. Pin the published reader cleanup commit c870bf4df98b01530c6b6e6ae5cd59bd5ea58cc3 from reader #4.

Remove four completed task-plan documents, correct format/storage claims and retire obsolete verification logs and build-artifact links in docs. Explicitly ignore local reader dependency overrides.

Testing

Full Flutter suite: 1,315 passed, 19 skipped (including existing opt-in network tests). Formatting and analysis passed; four web-bootstrap tests and the release web build passed. Dependency installation succeeds with --enforce-lockfile. Added regressions cover partial retry without duplicate imports, cleanup retry/concurrency, duplicate commit protection, picker cancellation and route-back cleanup while parsing finishes.

The Cupertino icon dependency is retained because the release build exposes an indirect use of its font. Native file parsers and persisted compatibility types remain active and are retained.

UI evidence

UI extraction preserves existing behavior; widget tests exercise the active import route and current filter controls. Reader visual/browser validation is recorded in reader #4.

Compatibility and migration

No data migrations or HTTP contract changes. Account/profile isolation, media rollback and stored reader locators retain their existing coverage. Merge reader #4 before this PR.

Notes

Removal candidates were traced through the runtime import graph and checked for conditional imports, platform references and active callers. Guest sample data is still used by the book-details provider and is retained.

Checklist

  • Branch, commits and title follow repository conventions.
  • Changes are limited to repository housekeeping and bounded extractions.
  • Relevant tests are updated and useful retired coverage is preserved.
  • Formatting, analysis and tests pass.
  • Documentation, UI evidence and migration notes are included.
  • No credentials, user media or generated builds are committed.
  • Branch is based on the target branch.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 3, 2026 21:27

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-03T21:30:49.413613Z f31e41b PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Eoic
Eoic merged commit 96c8b61 into master Oct 3, 2026
1 check passed
@Eoic
Eoic deleted the chore/repository-cleanup branch October 3, 2026 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants