Skip to content

chg: [sandbox-report] add enrichment sandbox provider defaults - #552

Merged
adulau merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sandbox-provider-defaults
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

adulau merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sandbox-provider-defaults

Conversation

@adulau

@adulau adulau commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add ANY.RUN to the SaaS sandbox suggestions; CAPE, FortiSandbox and GLIMPS Detect to the on-premise suggestions; and Hatching Triage to the public web-sandbox suggestions. Increment the template version to 3 while preserving its UUID, required relations and existing values.

Public tria.ge reports belong under web-sandbox: Triage's official FAQ states that all submissions on that service are publicly visible. Private enterprise deployments are distinct and should not be inferred from the public-service default. See https://tria.ge/docs/faq/.

The enrichment adapters can use the existing sandbox-report template with the appropriate sandbox-type and provider relation. No new object type is necessary.

CI repair: normalise the JSON with jq -S -j, including the repository's no-trailing-newline convention. The original failure occurred when validate_all.sh detected a file changed by its normaliser, before schema validation.

Local validation: all 454 object definitions and the relationship catalogue pass schema validation; all 22 relationship tests, opposite validation and UUID uniqueness pass; all definitions match normalisation and JSON files have no executable bit. Existing provider suggestions, template UUID and requirement lists are preserved.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T22:21:28.520888Z 70685f8 PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T22:20:45.660562Z 70685f8 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 70685f8da0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread objects/sandbox-report/definition.json Outdated
"symantec-cas-cloud"
"symantec-cas-cloud",
"any.run",
"hatching-triage"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Classify public Triage reports as web sandboxes

When this value represents the standard tria.ge Hatching Triage service, every submission and report is publicly visible, which matches this template's web-sandbox definition rather than saas-sandbox's explicitly non-public semantics; Hatching's private service uses separate private endpoints. Listing hatching-triage only here therefore steers users toward recording the wrong sandbox relation for public Triage reports. Add it to web-sandbox, or use distinct defaults for public and private Triage deployments. Triage's official FAQ documents the visibility distinction.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@adulau
adulau merged commit a9c09f2 into main Oct 29, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant