[TechEngineBot]

What & why

Closes #295

Adds 247 SoCs that were missing from data/soc/: Qualcomm 68, MediaTek 57, Intel 26, Unisoc 23, Amlogic 22, Rockchip 21, HiSilicon 17, Samsung 6, Nvidia 3, Texas Instruments 2, Apple 1, Google 1. No existing record changes.

How the records were chosen

• The slug is new, and the name does not match an existing SoC record, with or without the manufacturer, punctuation and part number.
• A chip whose part number or marketing name already appears on an existing record of the same manufacturer was left out (19 such part-number variants are held back for a separate look).
• Every required field (manufacturer, release date, process node, GPU name) was read from a table cell or row of the cited page, and re-read from the cited revision before the records were written.
• Where the page gives only a year or a quarter, the date is the first day of that period, as in the existing records.
• All records are "verified": false.

Source

Wikipedia SoC lists and articles (CC BY-SA), cited per record in source_urls, for example List_of_Qualcomm_Snapdragon_systems_on_chips, List_of_MediaTek_systems_on_chips, Apple_silicon.

Checklist

• The PR targets develop (main only moves through release PRs)
• python -m app.validate passes locally
• Files live at the correct data/<category>/<...>/<slug>.json path
• Slugs are kebab-case and unique within the category
• source_urls cites at least one canonical reference
• Sidebar filled in by hand: assignees, labels, milestone, projects, and the tracker under Development