Skip to content

[PWGHF] Fix KFParticle reconstruction in Xic0/Omegac0 candidate creator - #18047

Merged
fcatalan92 merged 1 commit into
AliceO2Group:masterfrom
mtorresc15:master
Sep 26, 2026
Merged

fcatalan92 merged 1 commit into
AliceO2Group:masterfrom
mtorresc15:master

Conversation

@mtorresc15

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes issues in the KFParticle reconstruction in candidateCreatorXic0Omegac0.cxx.

The following changes are included:

  1. Fix the application of the configurable V0 and cascade mass constraints. The constrained KFParticle objects were previously redeclared inside the corresponding if blocks, shadowing the original objects. As a result, the constrained particles were not propagated to the subsequent reconstruction steps. The constrained V0, Omega, and Xi particles are now assigned to the existing KFParticle objects when the corresponding mass-constraint configurable is enabled.
  2. Assign the correct charge hypothesis to the charm bachelor pion in the Omegac0 -> OmegaPi KFParticle reconstruction.
  3. Correct the comment associated with the Omega mass constraint.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the pwghf PWG-HF label Sep 24, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the title Fix KFParticle reconstruction in Xic0/Omegac0 candidate creator [PWGHF] Fix KFParticle reconstruction in Xic0/Omegac0 candidate creator Sep 24, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, ⚠️ 0 warnings, 🔕 1 disabled

@fcatalan92 fcatalan92 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mtorresc15 !

@fcatalan92
fcatalan92 enabled auto-merge (squash) September 25, 2026 16:13
@fcatalan92
fcatalan92 merged commit 87c9c23 into AliceO2Group:master Sep 26, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pwghf PWG-HF

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants