You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The primary differences between the Python and Excel versions of the SWEET methane emissions model are:
1) The Python model allows for composting and anaerobic digestion of paper and cardboard.
2) The Python model landfills waste that is rejected by combustion/incineration facilities.
3) The Python model uses 2019 IPCC defaults for compost and combustion/incineration when input data is not available.
Decay engine (checked against SWEET v4.0.6 by scripts/excel_engine_check.py; tests/test_excel_engine_parity.py replays the results):
4) Given the same inputs, the annual engine generates exactly the same methane as Excel.
5) Its emissions match Excel exactly too. Until 2026-10 Python oxidised the gas a flare fails to destroy, which Excel lets out through the flare as is; that made Python about 0.8% low at a landfill with 60% capture.
6) The monthly engine, which the TRACE pipeline runs, is within 0.5% of Excel over a site's life and within 4% in any one year. The largest gaps are in the first year after closing and in leap years.
7) Excel is wrong in one cell: 'I. CH4'!C64 (site 1, food, 2015) holds the 2016 formula, so Excel's 2015 food methane is really 2016's.